MedMI Logo
Back to Resources
Methodology April 28, 2026

Difference between FMEA and ISO 14971 Risk Analysis

Why engineers love FMEAs and why Notified Bodies reject them. Understanding the difference between bottom-up and top-down risk analysis.

MedMI Regulatory Team

ISO 14971 Specialists

Bottom-Up vs Top-Down

Engineers love FMEAs (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis), but regulatory auditors often reject them when presented as the sole Risk Management document.

Component Failure vs Patient Harm

An FMEA is a reliability tool. It looks at a component (e.g., a resistor) and asks, "What happens if this fails?" This is a bottom-up approach.

Regulatory Expectations

ISO 14971 requires a top-down approach. It asks, "What hazards are present in the clinical environment, and how could they lead to patient harm?"

While an FMEA is an excellent tool for verifying risk controls (specifically reliability), it completely misses usability errors, software logic flaws, and biological hazards. A compliant technical file uses ISO 14971 as the master document, with FMEAs supporting specific engineering mitigations.

Stop writing RMFs from scratch.

MedMI's AI-assisted platform generates ISO 14971 hazards, severities, and risk controls in minutes. Built for modern regulatory teams.